Same-Sex Marriage in Cali: Prop 8 Closing Arguments

I didn't quote you.

Quote :

Coyoteslayer unintentionally pointed out an important item in my opinion.

unintentionally

FDR wrote:

"I didn't quote you."

Yeah, I've been working with CS. in a brotherly effort in order to better help him understand what it actually means to quote someone. As of today, he finally gets the fact that the following symbols are in fact quotation marks: " ".

Nevertheless, he still seems to be at an UNINTENTIONAL loss of how to PROPERLY cite his sources. I think if we all just have a little more patience with the poor little feller, he'll eventually come to understand that it is not acceptable to plagiarize anyone. Right now, he's much Like Joseph Biden in that regard.

Quote :

Yeah, I've been working with CS. in a brotherly effort in order to better help him understand what it actually means to quote someone. As of today, he finally gets the fact that the following symbols are in fact quotation marks: " ".

Nevertheless, he still seems to be at an UNINTENTIONAL loss of how to PROPERLY cite his sources. I think if we all just have a little more patience with the poor little feller, he'll eventually come to understand that it is not acceptable to plagiarize anyone. Right now, he much Like Joseph Biden in that regard

.

I know how you cite sources dingleberry, but I told you already...I wasn't going to fix it. Maybe you need some help because you are showing signs of early stages of alzheimer's disease.

You should care enough to fix your stolen words CS. "Thou shalt not steal." - God. Your lack of regard for the work of others is simply a disgraceful abuse of The Commandments.

Isn't it against the forum rules to call people degrading names? Why must you resort to name calling? "Moron" - CS. , "Dingleberry" - CS. Why do the mods. allow this? Maybe you should call the doctor and get some Benzodiazepines. Please calm down man.

I have already apologized for calling you bad names CS. Please get a handle on your own emotions.

BERG wrote:

You should care enough to fix your stolen words CS. "Thou shalt not steal." - God. Your lack of regard for the work of others is simply a disgraceful abuse of The Commandments.

Isn't it against the forum rules to call people degrading names? Why must you resort to name calling? "Moron" - CS. , "Dingleberry" - CS. Why do the mods. allow this? : confused: Did you remember to take your Prozac and Xanax today?

I have already apologized for calling you bad names CS. Please get a handle on your own emotions.

ROTL don't be so sensitive Dingleberry. Yeah, I guess I will be going to hell now because I didn't write in the person who wrote the article. Damn it.

Forum Rules
No Attacking a person's race and/or religion
-No Personal Threats (this includes the politicians)
-Stay on Topic
-No links to porn sites and nudity
-Swearing is allowed but it has to be appropriate and NO F-bombs and other grossly vulgar words

-Don't be a douchebag

I don't find Berg the Dingleberry anywhere.

No, your going to hell for being such a arrogant DADB, and for intentionally stealing the writing of someone else with Malice. In fact, many would like to see you go to heck immediately. At least that's what I've heard.

Oh so you're judging people now.

I swear, you two are like a couple of monkeys in a cage hell bent on through poop at each other. Sadly, you BOTH come out covered.

No, but for a fact you have repeatedly violated this forum rule:

"Don't be a douchebag." - Admin.

Sadly, PRO allows you to continue making deparaging remarks to others.

Plus, passing judgement is not the same as pointing out facts.

BERG wrote:

Sadly, PRO allows you to continue making deparaging remarks to others.

As far as I am concerned, you both are guilty. Let's see who is the bigger man and stops.

After debating some of the other topics here I've come to realize that gay marriage really isn't any different than smoking legislation, sliding tax rates and drug prohibition.

Every single one of those items are what pro referred to as "tyranny of the masses", the only reason we allow it to go on is because we either find it personally objectionable or we aren't part of the group being legislated. I can't and won't go further with what was an inconsistency in how the government should govern (or not).

While I still hold firm to the belief that marriage is a religious institution, as soon as the government tied laws and property rights they (not the homosexuals) ruined the institution of marriage.

Leave marriage to the churches and if we insist on tying legal notions to partnerships, then extend them to everyone.

hyperduc wrote:

After debating some of the other topics here I've come to realize that gay marriage really isn't any different than smoking legislation, sliding tax rates and drug prohibition.

Every single one of those items are what pro referred to as "tyranny of the masses", the only reason we allow it to go on is because we either find it personally objectionable or we aren't part of the group being legislated. I can't and won't go further with what was an inconsistency in how the government should govern (or not).

While I still hold firm to the belief that marriage is a religious institution, as soon as the government tied laws and property rights they (not the homosexuals) ruined the institution of marriage.

Leave marriage to the churches and if we insist on tying legal notions to partnerships, then extend them to everyone.

+1

its all about freedom until the nuts dont like it , then its socialism and 'tearing down the constitution"


tm